EVN Report
  • Home
  • Magazine
  • SALT
  • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Հայ
Support
Աջակցություն
EVN Report
  • Home
  • Magazine
  • SALT
  • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
  • Eng
    • Հայ
Support
Աջակցություն
Morning News
  • Eng
    • Հայ
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics
Mar 16, 2022

Il Risorgimento Italiano and the Armenian National Movement

Daniel Tahmazyan
Illustration by Armine Shahbazyan.

Thus, love of a country
Begins as attachment to our own field of action
And comes to find that action of little importance
Though never indifferent. History may be servitude,
History may be freedom. See, now they vanish,
The faces and places, with the self which, as it could, loved them,
To become renewed, transfigured, in another pattern… for history is a pattern
Of timeless moments.

– T.S. Eliot[1]

The end of the 2020 Artsakh War, which resulted in a defeat for the Armenian side, led to, among other things, a natural rise in nationalism among the populace and Armenians in the diaspora. It is natural, because nationalism accompanies almost every armed struggle and its immediate aftermath. However, in the case of Armenia, after the defeat, an opinion that was widely circulating in social media was that the war was lost due to the individuals making up the government not being nationalist enough or the populace abandoning the principles of nationalism. The main argument is that the post-2018 revolutionary culture is no longer national but international. While the statement is not true, it still raises a question about nationalism and its origins. What is nationalism? Can nationalism be strictly national?

The first of these questions supposes a definition of a concept that has been in circulation since the end of the 18th century. A concept as amorphous as nationalism, with its many variations such as cultural nationalism and political nationalism, can never be defined clearly in an all-encompassing way. However, it can be contextualized in order to become more tangible and comprehensive. Nationalism in the 19th century, at least in the Armenian experience, was first and foremost a liberation movement aimed at freeing Western Armenia from the oppression of the Ottoman Empire. As such, it allowed for a rather interesting connection between the lot of the Armenians and other nations that were under foreign rule. That the efforts of the Armenians in Eastern Armenia were also predominantly aimed toward the liberation of Armenians from Ottoman oppression is evidenced by the fact that there were no active plans to rise up against Russian rule. Disagreements between the Russian government and the Armenian governorate were resolved within the framework of the empire itself. Occasional revolts, such as the participation of Armenians in the Revolution of 1905, were aimed at reforming the system of governance within the empire, not to throw off its yoke.[2] However, the national liberation movement was accompanied by cultural nationalism both in the eastern and western halves of Armenia. Even though this article will not focus on the latter, it will be referenced occasionally for a better understanding of the role of nationalism in Armenian history.

Reinhart Koselleck once wrote that history is better understood by the defeated rather than the victors, because the former ask about the causes of their defeat. Nothing could be more dangerous in Armenia’s situation than coming up with causes that have no bearing on reality.[3] If we want to arrive at workable solutions, we need to put to bed the discussion about how a lack of nationalism led us to where we are today. Perhaps a step in this direction would be to re-examine the Armenian national movement of the 19th century in relation to the Italian Risorgimento (Resurgence), to show how international nationalism conceptualizes war, nationalism and defeat.

 

Similarities Between the Italian and Armenian National Movements

National movements do not only imply political action, wars or revolutions. At times, they touch deeper tropes in a people’s history: dreams, ideas or hopes that have survived, perhaps for centuries, and shape the way a group of people acts. Hence, it is important to underline a dream developed by both Italians and Armenians independently that hints at an early form of national desire for independence. The word nationalism here is used with a certain reservation, simply for want of a better word. In the Armenian context, it was the dream of Nerses the Great, the Armenian Catholicos from 353-373 AD, that a savior from outside would liberate Armenia and reinstate peace in its affairs. Being deprived of statehood in 428 AD, and later after the fall of the Bagratids (1045) and the Kingdom of Cilicia (1375), Armenia waited for outside help to reach liberation. This is well demonstrated in the case of Israel Ori, who made it his calling to reify the dream of Nerses the Great. In Italy, on the other hand, partly due to Dante’s vision and influence, and partly to the political turmoil in the peninsula, there was a wish for a liberator to come from the North and bring peace and freedom to Italy, a myth that played an important part in the way Italians perceived the invasion of Charles VIII in the 15th century.[4] Dante hoped for the Holy Roman Emperor to bring peace and order. Centuries later, Savonarola, an influential if divisive figure in 15th-century Florence, preached about a savior from the North.[5] These circumstances were caused by the social and political upheavals in which the peninsula, and particularly Florence, found itself. It paralleled Armenia, when the fall of the Bagratids and the destruction of the nakharar system left a gaping void in the social hierarchy of the populace. But these dreams are only early forms of patriotic or national sentiments, which at least in the case of Italy had little influence on the actual 19th century national movement.

In the course of Italian history, this dream lost its symbolic meaning. If Italy became politically independent, it was mainly due to its own internal effort, aided by the sympathy of foreign observers.[6] Here Giuseppe Garibaldi plays an important role; his persona alone carried enough weight to attract a transatlantic interest into the affairs of the Italian Risorgimento. A notable example is Andrea Aguyar, a freed slave from Uruguay, who took part in the initial struggles for Italian independence after the 1848/1849 revolutions and died in battle defending the Roman Republic (1849). The Italian Risorgimento, since its inception, has been a worldwide phenomenon.[7]

Armenians, on the other hand, due to the complete loss of statehood, were forced to cherish dreams of liberation through the help of an outsider. Russia ultimately took this role upon itself. Consequently, the current Armenian Republic, due to its peculiar development as a state within the Soviet Union and before that as a governorate within the Russian Empire, still struggles with a Russian complex. However, the western half of Armenia, which lived under the Ottoman yoke until the 1915 genocide, followed a somewhat different path. Its struggle against the Ottoman Empire covered almost the entirety of the 19th century and was a matter of international attention.

Leaders of Armenian political parties, pursuing nationalist sentiments, found themselves in exile, similar to a number of leading Italian nationalist thinkers. For example, Mazzini founded Young Italy (La Giovine Italia) while in exile in Marseille in 1831 and, through clandestine connections, initiated a number of failed revolts in the peninsula. Eventually, Mazzini managed to bring about the short-lived Roman Republic, which was subdued with the help of the French Army called upon by Pope Pius IX.

The Armenian political parties had their headquarters in Geneva (Hunchakian Party), Marseille (Armenakan Party led by Mekertich Portukalian), and Tbilisi (Armenian Revolutionary Federation). This presence in the west and the Russian Empire ensured that the struggle for the liberation of Western Armenia was heard internationally. Moreover, Armenian political parties employed various methods of organizing the local Armenian population and encouraging them to rebel, e.g. implementing the ideology of the Narodnik movement taken from the Russian Empire. Through a series of popular revolts, attempts were made to force the Ottoman government into improving the conditions of the Armenians. A type of 19th century nationalism hence took on an international character, in that it was depicted as a struggle of the oppressed against an unjust rule.

Another feature that links the Armenian and Italian national movements is their association with heroes. The name of Giuseppe Garibaldi still finds positive reception in modern day Italy, whereas some of the other official “heroes” of the unification, such as the first King Vittorio Emmanuelle II, have a far more ambiguous and less favorable reputation among the public.

In fin de siècle Armenia, the national liberation movement was being driven forward by an independently organized militia, fedayi, stories about whom still have a mythical value in the Third Republic. Andranik Ozanian, Kevork Chavush or the most polarizing figure of them all, Garegin Nzhdeh, are but a few of the fedayi that played a similar role to Garibaldi in Armenian history. Given that the Armenian public was constantly informed about Garibaldi and his efforts at unifying the entire Italian peninsula (and it should be noted that the reports about him and his deeds were predominantly, if not always, in a positive light), it shouldn’t be surprising that this mystification of his figure played an important role in the way the Armenian fedayis styled themselves.[8] Or could this be just another pattern of history revealing itself in different contexts? One thing is certain: the Armenian and the Italian national movements were far more popular and less centralized in their efforts, in the sense that there was an attempt to mobilize parts of the ordinary population because there was a lacking support of, or in the case of Armenia a complete absence of, a professional army.[9]

 

Struggle of the Oppressed for Freedom

The similarities underlined in the first part do not end there. There was also a great sympathy between the two “oppressed” people, who were under foreign rule.[10] Mikayel Nalbandian is the most famous example of an Armenian observer of the events of the Italian national movement. While staying at Messina in 1860, he noted that it was a joyful sight to see the Redshirts of Garibaldi and the ordinary people celebrating the freedom of their fatherland by chanting the name of Garibaldi. He also notes that the bourgeoisie, or what in Italian could be termed as borghesie,[11] were chanting the name of Vittorio Emmanuel II.[12] It is not a coincidence that the lyrics of the current Armenian anthem, penned by Nalbandian, were inspired by the Italian national movement. Other notable Armenian intellectuals, such as Stephan Voskan, thought of the Italian Risorgimento as an example to follow, since Italians themselves revolted against foreign rule. Parts of northern Italy, then the Kingdom of Lombardy-Venetia, were under the rule of the Habsburgs. The southern part, the Kingdom of Two Sicilies, was under the rule of the descendants of the Spanish Bourbon dynasty. Voskan, inspired by the Italian national movement, thought that the Italians provided an example to follow for other oppressed nations who wanted to achieve freedom.

Later on, there were a number of Italians who showed support to the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. The son of Giuseppe Garibaldi, Ricciotti Garibaldi, wrote many letters that were addressed to the Armenian nation and were published in Western Armenian newspapers that called for an active revolt against Ottoman oppression.[13] One thing that is clear, however, is that the Italian nationalists, even after the creation of the Kingdom of Italy, continued to support the cause of the other oppressed nations, such as the Greeks and, to a lesser extent, the Armenians. The main aspect that linked Italians and Armenians was their common experience of being ruled by a foreign power. This only shows how different groups of people perceived nationalism as a way toward freedom. If freedom could be achieved by one group of people, it cannot be denied to the other, as evidenced by the active participation of Armenians in the Iranian Constitutional Revolution[14] between the years 1905-1911.[15] One could also raise the question of whether the Armenian nationalists wanted to have a national state, or if their initial goal was the unification of both parts of Armenia under Russian rule.[16] The Armenian national movement, besides fighting for the liberation of the Western Armenian territories, was preoccupied with the preservation of Armenian culture rather than its transcendence into a political entity.

Just as there were Armenian sympathizers for the Italian struggle in the mid-19th century, there were also Italian sympathizers for the Armenians at the turn of the 19th century. Nationalism was not an isolationist movement; it thrived because there was a common goal for each group. Even if the goal was to be achieved independently, each group encouraged the other in their struggle.

Irredentism and Radical Nationalism

The First Republic of Armenia was created when nationalism was nearing its zenith in the West, after the end of the First World War and as a result of the collapse of the Russian Empire. If we follow a topology advanced by Theodor Schieder, then this was the last form of creating national states, i.e. through the dismemberment of great multinational empires. The first two forms were to achieve a national state through revolution (France), and through diplomacy and national wars (Italy, Germany).[1]7 The formation of the Italian national-state, according to Schieder, came to completion only after the Great War, through the incorporation of South Tirol, which still remains part of modern-day Italy, but was absorbed only after the fall of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. While Schieder’s topology is too rigid and too Eurocentric to reflect a correct version of history of national movements and the creation of nation states, it still holds valid for Armenia and Italy.[18] Moreover, it marks a phase in both countries’ history that shows their irredentist aspirations.

Italy ended the First World War on the winning side, even though the victory for the Kingdom was a pyrrhic one. The state was left in a situation beyond repair and the March on Rome was only four years away. Dreams of Italia irredenta were, nevertheless, still pursued by a number of radical nationalists, Gabriele D’Annunzio being one of them. He occupied the city of Fiume with a brigade of volunteers in order to make it part of the Kingdom of Italy. The imagined Italia irredenta went well beyond the borders of the Kingdom of Italy or the current Italian Republic.

Irredentism in Armenia cannot be reduced to individual names or groups, as in the case of Italy; it has a more widespread character. Every Armenian is well acquainted with the term “Armenia from sea to sea”, which refers to Armenia’s territory under the reign of Tigran the Great in the 1st century BC. The term is reflective of Armenians’ image of Armenia as an entity bigger than it currently is, a phenomenon that has been accentuated after the Armenian Genocide. The 2020 Artsakh War has further complicated the situation; the memory of the lost territories is still fresh.

In the current Republic of Italy, the ideas of Italia irredenta have been abandoned, or at least are not a dominant part of the political discourse. This is evidently not the case for Armenia, where every household might envision a different image of what the Armenian world entails. Irredentism is inherent in both national movements, but isn’t it part of all national movements? Here we deal with another pattern of history that does not show itself only in the history of one people. The beauty of history is that it cannot be confined to national boundaries. There are always spillovers, and those who want to reduce it to national history merely impede its development.

 

Nationalism and Its Discontents

This comparison aims to serve as a reminder that no nationalism is unique. Given a set of similar circumstances, two different groups of people can develop the same dreams and aspirations, like the myth of a savior from the outside was developed both by Italians and Armenians long before the 19th century. It is important to stress the international character of both nationalisms. Armenian parties existed in a political world of a generally European character; hence, some of their attempts at turning a people into a nation were often out of touch with the Armenian reality. Eventually, through the growth of the diaspora caused by the Genocide of the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, the Armenian national movement acquired an undeniably international dimension. The international nature of the Italian Risorgimento has become abundantly clear in the preceding paragraphs. It’s worth mentioning that Italians themselves, through migration predominantly to North and South America, formed a strong diaspora, which added to the international character of Italian nationalism.

Map of United Armenia, Source: Wikimedia Commons
Map of Armenia as presented by the Armenian delegates of the Western Armenians at the Paris Peace Conference (1919). Source: Wikimedia Commons. Even the territories belonging to the Kingdom of Cilicia are included in the territory of Armenia.
Map of Italia irredenta, source: Wikimedia Commons. In green, the territories claimed by the irredentists.

It would, however, be a mistake to have a linear approach toward nationalism, i.e. to see its origin and its march through history from the perspective of linear development. Nationalism, as a phenomenon, can also have a cyclical nature.[19] It can rise and subside depending on the situation and, as such, nationalism is only a pattern of history and not a final phase. The challenge in the Armenian context is to be able to look at the national liberation movement as something that well and truly belongs to the past.

The only way to dismantle the myth of national superiority and radical nationalism is to understand the history of nationalism better, something which has not been done systematically by the historians of the Third Republic. Sadly, this task has been left to the Armenian historians in the diaspora (one recalls Ronald Grigor Suny) or to those historians who study and have an interest in Armenian history. However, to truly address the issues that nationalism causes in Armenia, there needs to be an internal discourse initiated first and foremost by historians. No outside influence is capable of actively transforming public opinion or steering it away from falling into radicalism.

 

Footnotes: 

1- Little Gidding. N. 4 of Four Quartets.
2- For more on the russophile behavior and integration of Eastern Armenians, at least its intellectual elites, into the social fabric of the Russian Empire, see: Aldo Ferrari, La cultura russa e il Caucaso. Il caso armeno, in: Studi Slavistici II, 2005 pp. 144-151. It is worth noting that, after the assassination of Tsar Alexander II, the Russian government, headed by Alexander III and later his son Nicholas II, did pursue a more vigorous policy of russification within the empire, which also affected the relations of the Armenians to the empire itself. These tensions subsided after 1905, however, when efforts were made by the Tsarist regime to reconcile with the Armenian populace, see: Aldo Ferrari, “Most of Them are Honourable”. Luigi Villari e gli Armeni durante la ‘guerra armeno-tatara’ del 1905-1906, in: Studi Slavistici XVIII, 2021, pp. 257-273.
3- Reinhart Koselleck, Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik, Suhrkamp, 5th ed. 2018, pp. 67-77.
4- Jacob Burckhardt, Kultur der Renaissance in Italien, Alfred Kröner Verlag, 2009, p. 76.
5- For more on Savonarola and his political influence as a preacher, see: J. G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment, Princeton University Press, 1975, pp. 104-105.
6- Even though a thinker like Gian Rinaldo Carli writing his dialogue Della Patria degli Italiani in 1765 had dreams of having Italy unified through culture, relinquishing the idea of a unified Italian state.
7- “During the uprisings of the 1820s, the Risorgimento’s global mobility spread out across the globe. Due to the Absolutist Restoration following the collapse of the constitutional regimes in Naples and Turin, exile was the ultimate possibility for pursuing revolutionary goals.” Alessandro Bonvini, Patriots without Borders: Towards an Atlantic History of the Risorgimento during the Age of Revolutions.
8- See: Hrachya Asmaryan:
The Reflection of the Italian National Liberation Movement in the “Arshaluys Araratian” that cites a number of issues of the newspaper that reported about Garibaldi and his actions as that of a hero. This points to the fact that his figure could be known at least to the literate part of the Armenian speaking population both in the western and eastern halves of Armenia. One could conjecture that, through word of mouth, Garibaldi’s name could also be spread amongst the illiterate parts of the population. After all, myths about a person, whether it be Garibaldi or an Armenian fedayi, usually generate from a public or popular opinions that are now categorized under oral history.
9- It is important to bear in mind that the initial stage of the Italian unification was undertaken by Cavour and the Kingdom of Sardinia. However, the Italian South (Mezzogiorno) was won over due to the efforts of Garibaldi and his Redshirts. The resonance of Garibaldi and his Expedition of the Thousand was so large that, a hundred years after the event, the great Rossellini commemorated it in his 1961 film Viva l’Italia!
10– “During the Age of Revolutions, Italian patriots adopted cosmopolitan attitudes alongside their aim of a national rebirth. They cherished values of political brotherhood towards their fellow men in Greece, France, the Iberian Peninsula, and the Americas and shared dreams of revolutionary revanche against absolutist powers, utopian projects of reform, and aspirations of emancipation that crossed state and imperial boundaries that shaped the idea of Risorgimento itself.” Bonvini, Patriots without Borders: Towards an Atlantic History of the Risorgimento during the Age of Revolutions.
11- In current historiography, historians usually refrain from using the word bourgeoisie as a name for a unified class of people, especially in the case of Italy, because of the divisions in the bourgeoisie itself. There could be an educated stratum of bourgeoisie or the Bildungsbürgertum or the bourgeoisie that owned property. In his text, Nalbandian uses the word քաղաքացի, which is a literal translation of the word bourgeoisie, itself coming from the Old French word bourgeois, meaning someone who lives in a town.
12- For the whole quote, see: Hrachya Asmaryan, The Italian National Liberation Movement and its Lessons, pp. 125-26.
13- Amilcare Ciparini is another name to mention. Being anarchist and a patriot who took part in a number of campaigns with Garibaldi as a young man, he also advised to choose the way of revolt as he did not believe that the Armenian population in the Ottoman Empire can await any positive result through maintaining its peace. For more: Hrachya Asmaryan, The Freedom-Loving Garibaldians about the Fate of the Armenian People, pp. 140-142.
14- That the Iranian Constitutional Revolution itself had a strong national element to it is very well demonstrated in the following article: Riktal Lal, Iranian Nationalism during the Constitutional Revolution, in: The Yale Review of International Studies.
15-“The love of freedom makes brothers of those two religiously different elements, that for centuries have learned to hate each other under subjugation.” The quote is taken from Houri Berberian’s book: Armenians and the Iranian Constitutional Revolution of 1905-1911, Routledge, 2018, p. 8. The author herself cites the Droshak newspaper.
16- If one looks at the life and activity of thinkers such as Grigor Artsruni, who thought that being under Russian rule was, in the interim, the lesser of two evils, it becomes evident that the Eastern Armenian intellectuals were mainly concerned about liberating their western counterparts from the Ottoman Empire with the help of the Russians. The goal of achieving a national state, if it existed at all, was only a longer-term one. Finally, Artsruni, being the founder of the Mshak newspaper, was himself a representative of cultural nationalism, that is, someone who was preoccupied with the preservation and propagation of Armenian culture.
17- Theodor Schieder, Italien und die Probleme des europäischen Nationalstaats, in Nationalismus und  Nationalstaat, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991, p. 334.
18- For one, it fails to account for the Greek war of independence in the 1820s and 1830s. It also pays no attention to the national movements outside of Europe, be they in Asia or Latin America. Benedict Anderson argues in his book, Imagined Communities, that nationalist elements could be detected in Latin America even before the French Revolution and also devotes a part of his book to the treatment of nationalism in Asia in order to challenge the Eurocentric narrative about nationalism.
19- Personal correspondence with Dr. Gregory Areshian (2019).
Comment

Leave A Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EVN Report’s mission is to empower Armenia, inspire the diaspora and inform the world through sound, credible and fact-based reporting and commentary. Our goal is to increase public trust in the media. EVN Report is the media arm of EVN News Foundation registered in the Republic of Armenia in 2017.

Subscribe

Quick Links

  • Politics
  • Opinion
  • Spotlight Artsakh
  • Raw & Unfiltered
  • Arts & Culture
  • Elections
  • Creative Tech
  • Law & Society
  • Economy
  • Elections
  • Understanding the Region
  • Readers’ Forum
  • Podcast
  • Editorial Policy & Guidelines

Follow Us On





@ 2024 EVN Report. All Rights Reserved

    Subscribe

      Բաժանորդագրվել

      Sections

      • Home
      • Magazine
      • SALT
      • Podcast
      • News Watch
        • Covid-19
      • EVN Security Report
      • Politics
      • Opinion
      • Columns
        • Unleashed
        • Tech Matters
        • Outside In
        • Beyond Borders
        • Art Speak
      • Spotlight Artsakh
      • Raw & Unfiltered
      • Arts & Culture
      • Et Cetera
        • ARTINERARY
      • Reviews by EVN Report
      • Creative Tech
      • Law & Society
      • Economy
      • Readers’ Forum
        • Protecting Infants With Disabilities
        • Volunteerism
      • Article Submissions
      • About Us
      • Eng
      • Հայ
      • Contact Us

      Subscribe to our Newsletter

      Donate

      SUPPORT INDEPENDANT JOURNALISM